the old times

May 31, 2012 1:18 am
tuesday-johnson:

ca. 1850’s, [daguerreotype portrait of a sleeping, or possibly deceased, child with toys]
via Christopher Wahren Fine Photographs

tuesday-johnson:

ca. 1850’s, [daguerreotype portrait of a sleeping, or possibly deceased, child with toys]

via Christopher Wahren Fine Photographs

  1. victoriane-r-a reblogged this from victorian-e-ra
  2. victorian-e-ra reblogged this from dead-people-cant-stand
  3. dead-people-cant-stand reblogged this from tuesday-johnson
  4. frootizloopiz reblogged this from tuesday-johnson
  5. youthhasgone reblogged this from tuesday-johnson
  6. stoneangelsirongates reblogged this from memorial-portraiture
  7. memorial-portraiture reblogged this from tuesday-johnson
  8. memoriesoldtimes reblogged this from tuesday-johnson
  9. haunted-shores-of-avalon reblogged this from tuesday-johnson
  10. cometinorbit38 reblogged this from tuesday-johnson
  11. ladykrampus reblogged this from tuesday-johnson
  12. deus-me-relinquit reblogged this from tuesday-johnson
  13. procastino reblogged this from tuesday-johnson
  14. phantom-lullaby reblogged this from zmaya
  15. zmaya reblogged this from tuesday-johnson
  16. astarsjourney reblogged this from higu
  17. ascoldasearth answered: totally dead
  18. whinyporcupine reblogged this from freakasaurous
  19. emilyclocke reblogged this from tuesday-johnson and added:
    More dead kids!
  20. flowisaconstruct answered: There’s an answer box here, even though you didn’t ask a question. So my answer is: yes.
  21. photographicarcadia answered: Sadly I would judge this to be a postmortem photograph, as the child is on a tablenot a bed - surely a living child would have been awoken.
  22. higu reblogged this from tuesday-johnson and added:
    my favorite part...this picture is the “possibly deceased” part, just because i’m that...
  23. freakasaurous reblogged this from tuesday-johnson
  24. tuesday-johnson posted this